# Truth Scorecard — Georgia U.S. Senate 2026: Ossoff vs. Collins — The GA Files > Every major attack line in the 2026 Georgia U.S. Senate race — Sen. Jon Ossoff vs. Rep. Mike Collins — held to one standard: what *Source: https://thegafiles.com/candidates/us-senate-scorecard.html · The GA Files (thegafiles.com)* --- [← U.S. Senate race: Ossoff vs. Collins](https://thegafiles.com/candidates/us-senate.html) GA Files · Truth in Politics # The Mud & The Facts: Georgia's U.S. Senate Scorecard Sen. Jon Ossoff (D, incumbent) vs. Rep. Mike Collins (R, GA-10), 2026. Every major attack line, held to the same standard — what's true, what's mangled, and the defense each side deserves. Compiled July 13, 2026 · updated July 18 · Sourced to AJC, GPB, WABE, NBC, CBS, Times of Israel, Georgia Recorder, KFF, Georgetown CCF & FEC filings · A companion to the Bottoms–Jackson governor's-race scorecard **Why this exists.** A slogan can be technically sourced and still leave a false impression. The goal isn't to pick a winner — it's to make sure no mangled "truth" from either camp stands without the fuller record beside it. Same standard for both. ● True ● Mostly True ● Misleading ● False ● Unproven / Disputed ● Needs Context ## Attacks on Ossoff from Collins / GOP Party-line voting, the economy, immigration, culture-war votes, out-of-state money — and one fabricated video. An AI “deepfake” video of Ossoff saying he backs a government shutdown and had “only seen a farm on Instagram.” Source: Collins campaign video, Nov. 2025 Fabricated What happened Collins's campaign released a video with **AI-synthesized audio of Ossoff saying things he never said**, carrying a small on-screen “AI-generated” disclaimer. As CBS Atlanta put it: “Ossoff never said any of it.” Collins's side The campaign didn't dispute the words were invented, defending the deepfake as a communication **“tactic.”** This isn't a stretch of a real quote — it's a manufactured one, which is why it sits at the far end of the scale. “Mike Collins passed $218.9M in rural healthcare funding for Georgia. Jon Ossoff voted NO” — while Ossoff “fought to give free healthcare to illegals.” Source: NRSC / Collins post, July 2026 · Checked vs. KFF, Georgetown & CMS Misleading What's true Georgia is set to receive about **$219M in year one** of a new federal Rural Health Transformation Program, and Ossoff **did vote no** on the 2025 law that created it — Trump's H.R.1 reconciliation act, which Collins backed. The omission That **same law cut Medicaid by roughly $911 billion** over ten years — with rural areas alone facing an estimated **$137–155 billion** in cuts (KFF). Independent analyses (KFF, Georgetown) find the $50B rural fund offsets **barely a third** of the rural cuts, is **temporary** (5 years) while the cuts are permanent, and caps direct-care spending at 15%. So “voted against rural healthcare” inverts the substance: Ossoff voted against a bill that, on net, **guts** rural healthcare — and Georgia rural hospitals are already cutting services (a northeast-Georgia hospital ended its labor-and-delivery unit). “Free healthcare to illegals” Undocumented immigrants are **already barred from federal Medicaid and ACA subsidies** (emergency care only). There is no Ossoff measure providing it — the same “fights for illegals” characterization the Collins/NRSC ads recycle. Ossoff “voted with Biden 98% of the time.” Source: Collins campaign ad (2026) · Checked vs. FiveThirtyEight tracker Needs Context What's true **FiveThirtyEight's presidential-support tracker scored Ossoff at 97%** alignment with Biden's position across Biden's first two years (the 117th Congress) — so the “98%” is essentially accurate, just rounded up about a point. Context But near-total alignment with one's own party's president is **normal for almost every senator of either party** — the score lumps in unanimous, procedural, and nomination votes, and Republican senators posted similar numbers backing Trump. The figure is real; on its own it says little about Ossoff specifically. He was “the deciding vote for Biden's inflation disaster.” Source: Collins campaign ad (2026) · Rated False by PolitiFact False What's true Ossoff voted for the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. The math The Senate split 50–50 and **VP Kamala Harris cast the actual tie-breaking vote**. Ossoff's yes was essential — but, as PolitiFact put it, “no more unique than the votes of 49 other Democrats.” Tellingly, Republicans **credited Harris as the “deciding vote” in their own 2024 messaging**. Whether the law caused an “inflation disaster” is disputed by economists, not settled fact. He voted for “higher taxes on gas and groceries.” Source: Collins campaign ad (2026) · Checked vs. IRA text (JCT / Tax Foundation) Misleading What's true Ossoff supported the IRA, which included energy and corporate tax provisions. Context There is **no federal grocery tax** — the IRA created none. Its only fuel-related levies fall on **producers, not pumps**: a reinstated Superfund excise tax on crude and imported oil (16.4¢/barrel — the Tax Foundation pegged the retail effect at about **0.2¢ per gallon**), plus a methane fee on oil-and-gas companies. Neither is a consumer tax on gasoline, and nothing in the law touches groceries. He backs “crazy far-left bills to let men compete in girls' sports.” Source: Collins campaign ad (2026) Needs Context What's true Ossoff, with Senate Democrats, opposed a Republican bill to bar transgender athletes from girls'/women's sports. Context Opposing a GOP ban is not the same as sponsoring “bills to let men compete” — the “men” framing describes transgender girls and is the contested heart of the debate, not an agreed fact. Ossoff “fights for illegals,” “voted against border security,” and flip-flopped on the Laken Riley Act. Source: NRSC ad “Ossoff Fights for Illegals in D.C.,” May 2026 Needs Context What's true Immigration and the Laken Riley case are a real vulnerability Georgia Democrats are defending against, and Ossoff has cast procedural votes Republicans read as soft on enforcement. Context Ossoff casts himself as pro-enforcement — _“The American people demand and deserve secure borders”_ — and in Jan. 2026 released an investigation into 1,000+ abuse reports in immigration detention, pairing border security with detainee dignity. “Fights for illegals” is a characterization; the specific Laken Riley Act votes should be read in full before accepting “flip-flop.” “California crazies gave him three times as much money as the entire state of Georgia.” Source: Collins campaign messaging (2026) · Checked against FEC Schedule A False The kernel There's a real fact underneath: California **is** Ossoff's single biggest state for itemized individual money, and it did out-raise Georgia in raw dollars — **$5.43M vs. $5.06M** in the 2026 cycle. The math But that's about **1.07×** — not three times. The “3×” figure is simply wrong. And Georgia actually gave through **more individual contributions (52,261 vs. 48,913)**, so by number of donors his home state leads. Even across the full 2021–2026 election period it's $7.09M CA vs. $6.09M GA (~1.16×). Context The specific number is false, but the **broader “out-of-state funded” charge does have teeth** — see **Follow the Money** below: ~82% of Ossoff's itemized money comes from outside Georgia (California most of all), while Collins is 63% Georgia-funded. _Figures: FEC Schedule A, committee C00718866, itemized individual only (sub-$200 excluded)._ Ossoff “never held a real job.” Source: Collins stump speeches (2026) Misleading What's true Ossoff entered the Senate in 2021 after a career outside elected office. Context Before the Senate he spent years as CEO of **Insight TWI, an investigative documentary-film company**. In office he chairs the Senate Human Rights Subcommittee, ran a 13-month Georgia foster-care investigation, and was lead Senate sponsor of the enacted **Federal Prison Oversight Act**. “Never held a real job” is dismissive framing, not fact. ## Attacks on Collins from Ossoff / Democrats Centered on the Epstein-files vote, inherited wealth, his social-media record, and his alignment with Trump. Collins “protected powerful elites instead of our children” by blocking release of the Epstein files. Source: Ossoff campaign ad, July 2026 (his most recent) Misleading What's true Collins **did initially block a Democratic procedural move to force release** of the Epstein files, and he closely follows Trump's lead — the ad's factual core is real. The omission The ad leaves out that Collins **later joined an overwhelming bipartisan vote to release the records** once Trump reversed and urged Republicans to back disclosure. “Protected powerful elites instead of our children” is emotive framing that skips the eventual yes vote. Related ad A separate earlier Ossoff ad claimed Collins “admitted” Trump was in the files (clip: “Yeah, I'm sure he's in there”). **PolitiFact rated that Mostly False** — Collins's full quote said Trump would be in them _because he'd reported Epstein to the FBI_, the opposite of implying wrongdoing. Collins is “under federal investigation for the illegal misuse of tax dollars.” Source: Ossoff (2026), referencing the House Ethics matter True — but unproven allegations What's true A **live House Ethics investigation** into Collins is real and documented in primary federal records: the Office of Congressional Conduct board voted **6-0** to refer three allegations, finding “substantial reason to believe” he misused congressional resources — centered on ~$10,000 paid to a “district intern,” Caroline Craze (identified as the chief of staff's girlfriend), whom staffers testified **never worked in the office**. The caveat Crucially, this is a **referral/investigation, not a finding of guilt** — it was unresolved as of early 2026, and Collins's office calls the allegations **“bogus.”** “Under investigation” is accurate; calling it “illegal” presumes an outcome that hasn't been reached. “A rich daddy, a former congressman, and a career politician himself” who was handed a company — getting “multimillionaire Mike richer while real truckers did the actual work.” Source: Ossoff campaign ad (2026) Misleading What's true Collins had a privileged start: his father, Mac Collins, was a U.S. Representative (1993–2005), and the family ran a longstanding trucking business. “Rich daddy / former congressman” is fair. The catch But the ad's core — that his father “handed Mike the keys to a company” — is what **AJC fact-checked as bending the truth**: Collins **started his own company (Collins Industries, 1992) and later bought his father out** (2005) as it grew. And “career politician himself” is off — he'd never held elected office before 2022 (_“I've never been elected to anything in my life until I got this gig”_). A privileged launch, yes; simply “handed a company,” no. Collins is a “notorious bigot, antisemite, and extremist.” Source: Ossoff campaign statement (2026) Characterization — documented basis, disputed The basis Ossoff — Georgia's first Jewish senator — points to specific, reported episodes: Collins replied approvingly to an antisemitic account that targeted a Jewish reporter (2024); he attended a New York Young Republicans gala featuring far-right and antisemitic figures; his chief of staff was reported to have joined group chats with white-nationalist personalities; CNN reported in July 2026 that his **son-in-law is a white-nationalist influencer** with 1.5M+ followers, appearing in campaign family photos and registered to vote at a Collins-owned property; and Collins has drawn repeated criticism (and an account suspension) for posts described as “racist, antisemitic or xenophobic,” and fired an aide in 2026 over one. Collins's side Collins rejects the label, casts his posts as blunt talk on crime and immigration, and his campaign has largely declined to engage the charge. **“Bigot/antisemite” is ultimately a subjective judgment** — the underlying incidents are documented and real; whether they add up to the label is for the reader to weigh, not something a fact-check declares true or false. He's a Trump loyalist who “promised to back his policies” — “maybe that's why Trump likes him so much.” Source: Ossoff campaign messaging (2026) True What's true Collins won the GOP runoff with Trump's endorsement and campaigns explicitly as a Trump ally who will support the president's agenda. Context This is accurate but not a “gotcha” — in a state Trump carried in 2024, Collins **runs on that alignment as a selling point**, not something he hides. Voters who back Trump's agenda may read it as a plus. ## Follow the Money FEC data Who actually funds each campaign? Itemized individual contributions, 2026 cycle (FEC Schedule A; sub-$200 unitemized money excluded). Ossoff: committee C00718866. Collins: candidate S6GA00390 (both authorized committees). Jon Ossoff (D) $27.9M itemized individual Share raised inside Georgia ~18% About **82% comes from out of state**. His single biggest source is **California ($5.43M)** — more than his entire home state ($5.06M). Mike Collins (R) $3.29M itemized individual Share raised inside Georgia 62.8% Only **37% out of state**. Top out-of-state sources: Florida $206K, Texas $183K, **California just $134K (4%)**. **The honest read:** Collins's specific “California gave 3× Georgia” line is still False (it's ~1.07×) — but the **broader charge that Ossoff leans on out-of-state money holds up**: roughly **82% of his itemized money comes from outside Georgia**, California most of all. The irony is that **Collins is the overwhelmingly Georgia-funded candidate (63%)**. Their out-of-state money also looks different in kind: Collins's is small-dollar national-GOP volume — Florida and Texas each send him _more individual donations_ than Georgia does, but averaging ~$30–40 apiece versus ~$550 per in-state gift. **The bottom line:** Both camps stretch. Collins's hits on Ossoff mostly take a real vote and inflate it (the “deciding vote,” “tax on groceries,” “never held a real job”) — and one, the AI deepfake, is outright fabricated. Ossoff's hits are often better grounded (the Epstein votes, the documented ethics investigation) but carry their own spin — the “handed a company” inheritance line was fact-checked as bending the truth, the Epstein ad omits Collins's eventual vote to release, and “antisemite” rests on real incidents yet remains a judgment call. Same standard, both sides: take the verifiable core, drop the spin. The “3× California money” claim was checked directly against FEC Schedule A data and rated False. A multi-source verification pass (primary federal documents plus AJC, PolitiFact, CBS Atlanta and others) confirmed the remaining items, including the AI deepfake and the House Ethics referral — which is an **unresolved allegation, not a finding of guilt**. The “98% with Biden” figure checks out — FiveThirtyEight's tracker put Ossoff at 97% for Biden's first two years, a level typical of almost any senator of a president's own party. The “tax on gas and groceries” line overstates the IRA, which created no grocery tax and no consumer gas tax — only producer-level Superfund and methane charges (a retail gas effect estimated near 0.2¢ a gallon). Subjective labels (“woke,” “extremist,” “bigot”) are flagged as such rather than rated true/false. Sources: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, PolitiFact, CBS Atlanta, NBC News, GPB, WABE, Times of Israel, Georgia Recorder, FiveThirtyEight, the Tax Foundation, the House Office of Congressional Conduct, the NRSC, and FEC filings. Reporting as of July 13, 2026; the race is ongoing. Prepared for the GA Files project. [← Back to the U.S. Senate head-to-head](https://thegafiles.com/candidates/us-senate.html)  ·  [The GA Files](https://thegafiles.com/)